Ispat-Sidbec : Entering North America

            




<<Previous Page

The Turnaround Contd...

As billet output increased, Sidbec turned its attention to increasing the production capacity at its bar and rod rolling mills in Contrecoeur and Longueuil. Sidbec had spent C$25 million to upgrade its rod mill in the early 1990s prior to the takeover. So large new investments were not required there.

The capacity of the 1960s-vintage Steckel hot-rolling mill limited the company?#8364;™s flat-products output, though, it had been upgraded significantly since installation. But surpassing the production level of 650,000-700,000 tons/year appeared difficult. Sidbec did not push slab production because slab-casting capacity then would have exceeded the capacity of the rolling mill.

The Steckel mill had some surface-quality limitations,
"But the way around it so far has been to cold-roll and galvanize as much as possible."
- Leboutillier.

Business Strategy Case Studies | Case Study in Management, Operations, Strategies, Business Strategy, Case Studies

or
Business Strategy Case Studies | Case Study in Management, Operations, Strategies, Business Strategy, Case Studies

or
PayPal (7 USD)

Sidbec?#8364;™s 75,000-ton/year pipe mill in Montreal used hot-rolled steel. The company also sold input materials to other pipe producers. Up to 500,000 tons per year could be cold-rolled on Sidbec?#8364;™s two Sendzimir cold-rolling mills, one of which was installed in 1992. A significant amount was galvanized at Soreveco and Co. Ltd., a hot-dip joint venture with Dofasco in Coteau-du-Lac, Que.

In 1995, the first full year under Ispat ownership, Sidbec recorded profits of C$104 million, resulting in an average payout of C$2,600 per employee. Sidbec had invested in the rod-mill upgrades, new Sendzimir mill, and Soreveco to move its products up-market. This trend continued under Ispat. Between 1994 and 2000, Ispat Sidbec modernized its rod mill, increased the capacity of its pickling line, added a second Sendzimir cold mill, and entered into a joint venture to make galvanized sheet ?#8364;œto make maximum use of DRI?#8364;™s advantages" for producing higher-value products.

By using a higher percentage of DRI in the furnace, Sidbec could melt cheaper grades of scrap, with the pure iron units diluting the residuals in the scrap. This became all the more important with new EAF capacities coming on-stream in the U.S, which increased pressure on the low-residual-grade scrap.

With a crude steel capacity of 1.6Mt/y by the turn of the century, Ispat Sidbec was undertaking a debottlenecking and cost reduction programme, involving an increase in capacity to 1.8Mt/y and was concentrating on increasing the proportion of (higher-margin) speciality steels manufactured at its Contrecoeur works.

In 2000, Ispat Sidbec posted slales of US$592M, but its gross and net operating margins fell as a result of higher shipment volumes. The margin decline reflected primarily the impact of higher energy costs. As profits increased, employees also gained. In 2002, Ispat Sidbec's operating profit was $41 million on sales of $534 million compared with a profit of $5 million on sales of $463 million in 2001. Net sales at Ispat Sidbec increased 5% to $149m, mainly due to an increase in shipments of semi-finished products, slabs and billets. Sales of flats remained stable and wire rod sales were lower because of limited exports to the US.

By the close of financial year 2003, Ispat Sidbec shipped an estimated 1.6 million ton of finished steel. It was manufacturing various products which included hot, cold and galvanized sheets, wire rods, bar and pipes. These products were sold mainly in the US.

Between August 1994 and December 2003, Ispat Sidbec invested $193 million towards capital expenditure. Ispat Sidbec?#8364;™s total shipments grew from approximately 1.3 million tons in the year prior to acquisition to 1.6 million tons in 2003.

Next Page>>

Advertisement...

top